Showing posts with label rule of law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rule of law. Show all posts

Sunday, December 23, 2012

What is law?


Given what appears a nearly willful historical amnesia, it is easy for the popular imagination to suppose that existing political and social conventions have always been so, or that preceding social norms are by necessity inferior to the current "enlightened" perspective promulgated via public education and popular media.

As such it would be inconceivable for many that "the law" has any other source than legislative bodies.  For an American the answer to the question "Where do laws come from?" is, if goes beyond a nebulous "the government," is Congress, where democratically elected representatives compose the rules of society.  Before that, if before that is even considered, kings ruled arbitrarily with absolute power, always fighting wars and throwing people in dungeons.

But the idea that law is either the will of the king or the work of the legislature is a very recent idea, arising  in America at least, in the early 20th century with the Wilsonian concept of democracy as a transcendental ideal and the ultimate "good" form of government..

Today, while reading, On the Impossibility of Limited Government and the Prospects for a Second American Revolution by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, I came across a reference to Kingship and Law in the Middle Ages By F. Kern.  Translated by S. B. Chrimes. 2nd imps., 1949.

I did a little digging and found this nugget.

The idea is that law is independent of kings and legislatures, that like the rules of logic derived from axiomatic first principles, the law is the logical structure derived the from the moral principles of human interaction.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Where's My Flying Car?

They promised me a flying car...


Puck T. Smith shared Economic Freedom's photo.
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 4:44pm


Todd ZombieHunter Boggia
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 5:50pm
Where is the flying car? Hasn't been much change in the last 2 pics if you think about it...


Rocco Stanzione
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 6:09pm
If you take what the law says a car can be, and what it says an aerial vehicle can be, there's no intersection that conforms to any possible reality. The flying car has been invented a hundred times, it just isn't legal to sell or operate.


Todd ZombieHunter Boggia
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 6:19pm
BAM!

Monday, September 15, 2008

What illegal "things" was the government doing in 2001-2004?


I'd probably disagree with him on what he might call economic justice issues, but when it comes to the rule of law and civil liberties, there are few around who can come close to Glenn Greenwald.

What illegal "things" was the government doing in 2001-2004?
Glenn Greenwald

For the second consecutive day, The Washington Post has published an excerpt from reporter Barton Gellman's new book on the Cheney Vice Presidency, and it provides still more details on the intense confrontation in March, 2004 between the Bush Justice Department and the Cheney-led White House over the DOJ's refusal to certify the legality of the NSA's domestic spying activities. As has been known ever since Deputy Attorney General James Comey testified before the Senate in May, 2007, all of the top-level DOJ officials -- including Attorney General John Ashcroft, Comey and FBI Director Robert Mueller -- told President Bush they would resign immediately because Bush ordered the NSA surveillance program to continue even after his own Justice Department told him it was patently illegal. Comey drafted his resignation letter, calling Bush's spying activities "an apocalyptic situation" because he had "been asked to be a part of something that is fundamentally wrong."

It gets better...